This paper aims to analyze whether the implementation of the Brazilian social security system, defined by the 1988 Constitution, has an identity with the social protection model proposed in the Beveridge Plan, in which protection was provided for in an articulated manner, rejecting the idea, existing until then, to adopt isolated and disjointed services or measures. Using the method of comparative approach, a parallel will be drawn between the historical and legal premises presented in the English Plan and the Brazilian ones, arising from the 1988 Constitution, to, in the end, demonstrate that the Brazilian protective system, contrary to what was proposed by Beveridge, in a decontextualized way and adopting disjointed policies has contributed little to guarantee fair protection.